<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Media Marketing Secrets from NYC and Los Angeles &#124; IPhone App Developer &#187; pagerank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sparkah.com/tag/pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sparkah.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing, Viral Marketing, Business, and Life Strategies That Don&#039;t Suck (Mostly)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Google Determines and Ranks Your Relevancy</title>
		<link>http://sparkah.com/2010/02/03/how-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://sparkah.com/2010/02/03/how-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing and PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparkah.com/2010/02/03/how-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, I think this graph, as reassuring and emboldening as it is, is totally bunk, (couple more commas, thrown in, for good measure). Image via two sites I highly recommend following religiously if you are even remotely involved in web business or like cilantro: http://www.copyblogger.com/seo-copywriting-matter/ and http://www.seomoz.org/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization Here&#8217;s why: 1. The wedges, &#8220;Anchor text&#8221; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsparkah.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fhow-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsparkah.com%2F2010%2F02%2F03%2Fhow-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><div class="posterous_autopost">
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Personally, I think this graph, as reassuring and emboldening as it is, is totally bunk, (couple more commas, thrown in, for good measure).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><img src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y13-uqJG0_Y/getfile/files.www.youtube.com/watch?v=y13-uqJG0_Y/journik/jGGIadIsInoDxcsyDaicmCdvzwCprwJqajjEECkiCHpaHpGFxFCaoeqmnGjA/media_httpnetdnacopyb_xCvsg.gif.scaled500.gif" alt="" width="468" height="462" /> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Image via two sites I highly recommend following religiously if you are even remotely involved in web business or like cilantro: <a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/seo-copywriting-matter/">http://www.copyblogger.com/seo-copywriting-matter/</a> and <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/perfecting-keyword-targeting-on-page-optimization</a> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">Here&#8217;s why:</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">1. The wedges, &#8220;Anchor text&#8221; and &#8220;Link popularity&#8221; are exactly the same thing</span></strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Google bases PageRank based on external links (base! (one more thrown in for good measure)).</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">2. This is a SEO (search engine optimizers&#8217;) poll &#8212; NOT based on a Google engineer&#8217;s leaked data</span></strong><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
Let this be very clear. This chart is built on the OPINIONS of SEO Expert Ninjas</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">3. Matt Cutts is reaching for a muscle relaxant due stomach cramping from laughing so hard at #2 (above)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">4. Wedge &#8220;Traffic + CTR data&#8221; are exactly the same thing &#8212; WRONG. </span></strong><br />
<span style="font-size: medium;">Google measures repeat CTR from THEIR pages not YOUR server traffic. Google doesn&#8217;t care how much traffic you get. It bears ZERO weight on relevancy of your page to search query. Think logically. If your stomach Googled &#8220;hamburger,&#8221; would you rather get a McDonald&#8217;s or an In-N-Out? McD&#8217;s gets far more traffic in their drive thrus but the QUALITY of the result is what matters to Google.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">5. Meta Tags!</span></strong><br />
<span style="font-size: medium;">I know, the graphic does not cite meta-tags and it shouldn&#8217;t. Because, to the credit of the graphic and those surveyed, meta tags went out with the Macarena. BUT you and I both know that these SEO Expert Ninja Samurais still use meta keyword tags. So not citing them as a 50% factor is totally disingenuous.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">#6 BONUS: They left out the most import part&#8230; </span></strong><br />
<span style="font-size: medium;">Among Google&#8217;s BIGGEST ranking factors is whether or not the content is on a page that is within a property OWNED by GOOGLE. It&#8217;s true. Google would rather you visit a Youtube, Knol, or Blogspot web result. It&#8217;s further true that they&#8217;d rather you visited a Google result that has a Google adwords ad on it. I mean, come on, wouldn&#8217;t you?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;">If you want to team up with <a title="310 598 1606" href="http://journik.www.youtube.com/watch?v=y13-uqJG0_Y">Bob Wan Kim</a> on your corporate marketing and business proliferation, Contact him at <a href="http://sparkah.com">http://sparkah.com</a></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y13-uqJG0_Y">Posted via web</a> from <a href="http://journik.www.youtube.com/watch?v=y13-uqJG0_Y/how-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevanc">journik&#8217;s posterous &#8211; a grade A shouldery. (social media agencies / marketing wise)</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sparkah.com/2010/02/03/how-google-determines-and-ranks-your-relevancy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

